<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL media buys should include team Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patcoyle.net/2007/11/21/656/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patcoyle.net/2007/11/21/656/</link>
	<description>"The things we think and do not say," J.M.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.patcoyle.net/2007/11/21/656/#comment-39115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patcoyle.net/2007/11/21/656/#comment-39115</guid>
		<description>Youre definitely right, the NFL's main website is nice but the team websites really are lacking when compared to most websites out there.  There are a lot of fantasy football websites that give much more information and are easier to use.  I'm surprised the NFL marketing machine hasnt really put much of an emphasis on this, since they seemingly analyze every other aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youre definitely right, the NFL&#8217;s main website is nice but the team websites really are lacking when compared to most websites out there.  There are a lot of fantasy football websites that give much more information and are easier to use.  I&#8217;m surprised the NFL marketing machine hasnt really put much of an emphasis on this, since they seemingly analyze every other aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
